What I noticed lately is that I tend to over invest in the low limit tables. I realize that this may have more to do with my mindset and bankroll than a betting strategy, but I still wonder if anyone approaches the two table limits differently. I rarely press and the most I place inside on any table is 110 (and then will still regress after a hit or two if I can manage it). Similarly, why not start at 44 inside and then regress to 22? (Although if everyone at the table is just grip and ripping it, I'd probably stay at table min). ![]() Granted, if the table's choppy, if I'm down, or not shooting well, the lower $ exposure helps, but I keep thinking if I'm willing to risk $20 at one table why not add the extra on the odds on the other. Yet at a $5 dollar table, typically it's 10 or 11 total PL w odds. For example, at a $10 table I bet single odds on PL or CL (if I'm playing CL) so $20 total on PL w odds. I ask because I realized this weekend that my mindset seems different and I hadn't really noticed it before. ![]() ![]() Do you bet differently on a $5 table than on a $10? I usually play on $5 if there's a spot and $10 if the table is empty or nearly empty (or if there's no other option). My newbie Question of the day for everyone-but esp.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |